Search Results for 'huffington post'


Cannes Reviews: Sicko

Wed, 05/23/2007 - 4:50am story by BuzzSugar

For the most part critics are heralding Michael Moore’s latest documentary Sicko for providing an eye-opening look at the health insurance crisis in the U.S. Many are also uttering sighs of relief that Moore’s political viewpoints are relatively subdued in the film, unlike his previous documentaries in which many found Moore’s opinions shoved down their throats, ultimately undermining the messages of the films.

Curiously, even the Fox News website is giving Sicko a favorable review, though the critic is quick to note this is because Moore isn’t “confronting” anyone. The most common complaint for Sicko is that in comparing American system to that of Cuba, Canada and England (among other countries), Moore paints an absurdly rosy picture of other systems in order to highlight just how horrifying things are here, but the rosiness isn’t exactly accurate, either.

Check out some excerpts from various reviews of Sicko:

Variety:
“…An entertaining and affecting dissection of the American health care industry that documents how it benefits the few at the expense of the many. Pic’s tone alternates between comedy and outrage, as it compares the U.S system of care to other countries.

Chief criticism of the film is that it paints too rosy a picture of the national health care of the countries he compares America to, including Canada, England, France — and Cuba.â€

More views if you

Entertainment Weekly:
“There’s a certain robust clarity of political activism in this latest salvo from media provocateur Michael Moore that marks a new maturity.”

Cinematical:
“I know it’s nit-picking, but I don’t think I’m the only person who watches Moore’s films and wishes they had more clarity and less hilarity — at the same time, I think that a large mass of the American public is so desperate for someone to speak truth to power that they’ll settle for someone willing to say anything to it, no matter how specious or muddled.

It’s that tone — of selfless self-celebration, of public altruism, of snide sensitivity — that undercuts a lot of Moore’s work, and it undermines Sicko. I don’t expect a film to solve the American health care crisis, but even as a call to arms, Sicko’s more muddled and muted and scattered than it should be. Moore may be challenging the system, but he still feels like the guy who brought a clown’s squirting flower and a joy buzzer to a knife fight and then wonders out loud why he lost.”

Fox News:
“Filmmaker Michael Moore’s brilliant and uplifting new documentary, Sicko, deals with the failings of the U.S. healthcare system, both real and perceived. But this time around, the controversial documentarian seems to be letting the subject matter do the talking, and in the process shows a new maturity.

Unlike many of his previous films… Sicko works because in this one there are no confrontations. Moore smartly lets very articulate average Americans tell their personal horror stories at the hands of insurance companies. The film never talks down or baits the audience.”

Huffington Post:
“Here’s what Moore found. Care ‘doesn’t depend on your premiums, it depends on your needs,’ the film reports. You don’t have to check your health security at the door, or mortgage your future when at your most sick and vulnerable.
Moore’s not even afraid of the inevitable complaints about ‘socialized’ medicine. ‘Back home in America we’re socializing lots of things,’ Sicko finds, among them our fire and police service, Social Security checks, and even the library.â€

Source



Related Buzz Stories
Related Stories Across the Network

Fixing School Lunches

June 21, 2007

I am an occasional contributor to Huffington Post where I recently commented on the need to take action–now–on childhood obesity and school lunches.


John Kerry: The Vote Of A Lifetime

Posted by Pamela Leavey
January 29th, 2006 @ 10:55 pm

There’s a new post just up on the Huffington Post from John Kerry on the Alito Filibuster — The Vote Of A Lifetime.

Here’s a few quips:

Many people seem curious or even skeptical why United States Senators believe it’s so important to take a stand against the confirmation of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court — why we’re willing to take on a fight that conventional wisdom suggests we will lose.

The reality is simple. We care about the future of our country.

We care about the millions of Americans who expect Congress to stand up and fight for their rights and their freedoms, and we also know that the Supreme Court, again and again, is the battlefield on which those rights and freedoms are decided.

So let’s get this straight. The time to fight is now - before we make the irreversible decision of confirming a new Supreme Court Justice. When you’re talking about the Supreme Court, you don’t live to fight another day. It’s a zero sum game. Once Judge Alito becomes Justice Alito, there’s no turning back the Senate confirmation vote. We don’t get to ‘take a mulligan’ when choosing a Supreme Court Justice. The direction our country takes for the next thirty years is being set now. Will it matter if we speak up after the Supreme Court has granted the executive the right to use torture, or to eavesdrop without warrants? Will it matter if we speak up only after a woman’s right to privacy has been taken away? Will history record what we say after the courthouse door is slammed in the faces of women, minorities, the elderly, the disabled, and the poor? No. History will record what we say and what we do now.

Read on at the Huffington Post

The final words to remember on this fight from John Kerry, “We cannot win unless we try.”

Population: Ultimate Problem of all Problems

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Over at the Huffington Post blog, David Roberts, a staff writer for Grist.org, describes the relationship between activist causes, like women’s reproductive rights and “sustainable development,” and population control.

Roberts says he doesn’t directly address the problem of over-population because talking about it as such isn’t very effective. Apparently, telling people that they and their kids very existence is the “ultimate problem of all problems” doesn’t resonate very well. It “alienates a large swathe of the general public,” you know, the ones who still have some residual moral sensibilities.

So, instead, Roberts pursues items that he think will ultimately result in lowered populations…a subordination of these causes as means to the greater end. He writes, “Each of these — empowering women and spreading prosperity — is worth pursuing in its own right. Each is a powerful political rallying cry. Each produces a range of ancillary benefits.”

But of course the greatest benefit of them both is that they help in “scaling human population back.”

And as Roberts notes, the connection between radical environmentalism and population control has been devastating for the cause, leading him to conclude that overt population control rhetoric “is political poison.”

His concluding advice? “If you’re worried about population, work toward sustainable development and female empowerment.”

And, I might add, if you are able to similarly disguise a radical environmentalist agenda and separate out the perception of pursuing population control, why not work toward that too?

Arianna and Me

Posted in Big Business Loves Big Government, Regulate Me!, My Clips, Corporate Welfare, Media, The Big Ripoff, Green is the Color of Money, Ethanol, Global Warming on July 13th, 2006

I have a guest post up on the Huffington Post today:

After watching An Inconvenient Truth and sitting through one of Al Gore’s PowerPoint presentations, I have just one question remaining: Why is Al Gore pushing Enron’s agenda?

Read the post here.

A Conflict of Interest

Posted in Big Business Loves Big Government, Trade & Economics, Corporate Welfare, The Big Ripoff, Green is the Color of Money, Global Warming on October 31st, 2006

When I write blog posts challenging the wisdom and effect of regulations, I get called a “shill” and asked how much my soul cost, because one of my benefactors is partly funded by parts of the oil industry. The idea is that you can’t trust Exxon on environmental issues because environmental laws would affect Exxon’s ability to make money. By extension, you can’t trust me.

This week, the British government issued a report declaring that global warming would be catastrophic, and the next day it uses this report as the reason to push “enabling powers” to give the government more control over people’s lives.

The conflict of interest seems much more direct in the latter. The media only seem to notice the former.

links for 2005-06-30

Fowling off

Monday December 12th 2005, 4:05 pm
Filed under: Blog Posts

Democratic operative Donnie Fowler defends the New Hampshire primary in his Huffington Post blog, but then says other states could vet candidates as well as New Hampshire does. I’d call that a protect the plate swing.


No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Moyers: Murdoch uses journalism as personal spittoon

June 29th, 2007

Bill Moyers, the PBS show host, writes on the Huffington Post Friday that the proposed purchase of Dow Jones & Co., the parent of The Wall Street Journal, by News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch is just another example of how he has used journalism for his own purpose.

Bill MoyersMoyers wrote, “Murdoch and The Journal’s editorial page are made for each other. They’ve both pursued the right’s corporate and political agenda of the past quarter century. Both venerate what The Journal editorials call the ‘animal spirits’ of business. But The Journal’s newsroom is another matter — there facts are sacred and independence revered. Rupert Murdoch has told the Bancrofts he’ll not meddle with the reporting. But he’s accustomed to using journalism as a personal spittoon. In the months leading up to the invasion of Iraq, he turned the dogs of war loose in the newsrooms of his empire and they howled for blood. Murdoch himself said the greatest thing to come out of the war would be ‘$20 a barrel for oil.’

“Of course he wasn’t the only media mogul to clamor for war. And he’s not the first to use journalism to promote his own interests. His worst offense with FOX News is not even its baldly partisan agenda. Far worse is the travesty he’s made of its journalism. FOX News huffs and puffs, pontificates and proclaims, but does little serious original reporting. His tabloids sell babes and breasts, gossip and celebrities. Now he’s about to bring under the same thumb one of the few national newsrooms remaining in the country.

“But the problem isn’t just Rupert Murdoch. His pursuit of The Wall Street Journal is the latest in a cascading series of mergers, buy-outs, and other financial legerdemain that are making a shipwreck of journalism. Public minded newspapers are being dumped by their owners for wads of cash or crippled by cost cutting while their broadcasting cousins race to the bottom. Murdoch is just the predator of the hour. The modern maestro of a financial marketplace ruled by money and moguls. Instead of checking the excesses of private and public power, these 21st century barons of the First Amendment revel in them; the public be damned.”

Read more here.

Marijuana Trumps Blackberries for Productivity… and Amazon Challenge

The Book: The 4-Hour Workweek, Low-Information Diet and Selective Ignorance, E-mail Detox

image00002.jpg
This guy gets more done than your CTO
(photo credit: Indian Gypsy)

My first article for Huffington Post made it onto the homepage today: Marijuana Trumps Blackberries for Productivity. Here is some food for thought:

Millions of Blackberry users in the US were left without their favorite drug from 8pm EST Tuesday to 6am EST Wednesday last week, when technical problems at service provider Research In Motion cut off wireless e-mail access. Some fumed, but others took a deep breath of relief. The brief escape was relished by a growing number of users who have realized that this digital leash often kills productivity instead of increasing it.

Not convinced? Let’s compare Blackberries to the top anti-productivity product of all-time: good old-fashioned marijuana.

In 2005, a psychiatrist at King’s College in London administered IQ tests to three groups: the first did nothing but perform the IQ test, the second was distracted by e-mail and ringing phones, and the third was stoned on marijuana. Not surprisingly, the first group did better than the other two by an average of 10 points. The e-mailers, on the other hands, did worse than the stoners by an average of 6 points.

In a digital world of infinite distraction, it is “single-tasking” — shutting out interruption instead of facilitating it — that will save us. What’s the alternative? Checking e-mail once every five minutes, then every minute, then every second? It’s not a scalable coping mechanism.

The world doesn’t hiccup, let alone end, if you check e-mail twice a day instead of twice an hour. If it does, it usually means that your work culture rewards overwork to counter its own ineffectiveness. This is predicated on burnout and not a game worth winning. The next time you get the Crackberry urge, consider the option of being productive instead of being busy. Or, if that’s too abstract, consider grabbing a joint instead — you’ll probably get more done.

###

AMAZON CHALLENGE: The 4-Hour Workweek has been hovering around #105 for four days on Amazon, and now it’s officially on-sale! Please help me break the #100 barrier — I can’t let The Official Guide for GMAT Review beat me! If you’re even remotely interested in automating and outsourcing your life, I guarantee you this book will open your eyes to some amazing new options: Please help me break the #100 barrier!